Over the next ten years, the Albanese administration has committed to reducing Australia's greenhouse gas emissions by 62–70% of their 2005 levels.
On Thursday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese unveiled the much anticipated 2035 goal, while the opposition cautioned about the expense of reaching any number.
The next phase in Australia's quest to achieve net zero by 2050 is the "ambitious" new pledge.
In order to reach Australia's 2030 objective of 43% emissions reduction, the government claimed to have built on "substantial progress" made during the previous three years.
In order to prevent rising global temperatures, the Paris Agreement requires the 2035 objective.
Signatories cannot lower their emissions-reduction goals; they must raise them every five years.
By the end of September, participating nations are required to submit their updated targets.
Australia has been working on its 2035 objective for a year or more, and there has been much discussion about it.
Additionally, the government declared that a $5 billion net-zero fund will be established to increase the use of renewable energy sources and decarbonize major enterprises.
To assist down electricity costs, an additional $2 billion would be spent.
According to the prime minister, the transportation, industrial, and electrical sectors would require the greatest reduction in emissions.
Prior to his journey to New York for the United Nations General Assembly, Albanese made the plan public.
"We want to keep taking advantage of the economic opportunities that the energy transition presents to our country, and our administration is aware that climate change is serious," he told reporters in Sydney.
"This is a responsible goal based on established technology, backed by science and a workable plan to achieve it."
However, it was insufficient for the Greens, who denounced the statement as a "joke" that deceived both the environment and Australians.
Senator Larissa Waters, the leader of the Greens, demanded a higher goal and charged that the government was giving in to the coal sector.
She called it "shameful" and "outrageous," saying, "This objective is so appallingly low, it will not keep us safe from the climate damage."
A target range of 65 to 75 percent was earlier proposed by the Climate Change Authority as possible by 2035.
The Coalition, which is divided on net zero, is unified in its opposition to the government's "train-wreck energy policy," according to Opposition Leader Sussan Ley.
According to Ley, "this announcement does not show Australians how much it will cost."
And it is not fair to families, companies, or the diligent manufacturers in this nation who are seeking answers and whose electricity costs are skyrocketing.
"We are witnessing three distinct energy failures under this administration. The price has increased. Dependability has declined. Emissions are also stagnating.
Andrew McKellar, the chief executive of the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, told ABC TV that it was a "difficult aim" from a commercial perspective.
He declared, "Business is dedicated to doing its share to ensuring that we can reach that objective of net zero by 2050."
"People are not deluding themselves. A lot of work will need to be done. This goal involves a lot of labor. However, we must make sure that we strike a balance between scientific issues and economics.
Given that certain promising green technologies, like green hydrogen, had not yet been realized, McKellar stated that there were numerous obstacles in the way.
However, we must not give up at the first obstacle. We must keep moving forward. The policy decision made today, in my opinion, contributes to some of that certainty by giving businesses the guidelines they must follow and allowing us to get on with our work.
The climate objective will be both ambitious and attainable, according to Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen.
"If we do this correctly, the global transition to renewable energy is the greatest economic revolution since the Industrial Revolution and it offers Australia our greatest economic opportunity ever," he stated.
"We can leverage these benefits to fuel fresh investment and hundreds of thousands of jobs, positioning us for a prosperous future."
Social services organizations, unions, and environmental groups were among those advocating for a challenging goal.
The business community exercised greater caution, cautioning that reducing emissions by more than 70% would jeopardize over $150 billion in export revenue and force businesses to relocate elsewhere.
Australia and 195 other countries ratified the Paris Agreement in 2015 with the goal of keeping global warming to 1.5C over pre-industrial levels.
Matt Kean, chair of the Climate Change Authority, expressed optimism that Australia might "overachieve" the set goal.
In terms of climate emissions, he stated, "Australia is positioned as a worldwide leader; in fact, we are proposing a larger ambition than most other advanced economies."
"Our bottom-up research shows that we have done just that, since the Paris Agreement relies on countries to establish their highest achievable goal in light of their national circumstances."
The cost of reducing emissions has also drawn criticism from the federal government, endangering the coalition's stability as certain members vigorously advocate for doing away with net zero completely.
Following the publication of the first National Climate Risk Assessment, which presented a dire outlook for Australia's future in the event that global warming is left unchecked, the climate target was announced.
0 Comments